Smart approaches to address regulatory burden of EU social regulations


Ecorys supported BusinessEurope by examining how EU social instruments translate into operational impacts for businesses.

Introduction

EU social legislation helps protect workers and support fair labour markets. However, employers also face increasing compliance requirements that can create administrative and operational burdens, particularly for SMEs. Ecorys supported BusinessEurope by exploring how businesses experience and manage these regulatory obligations in practice, and by identifying smart approaches that businesses have adopted in an effort to reduce unnecessary burden.

Background

European employers operate within an extensive framework of EU social legislation covering areas such as working conditions, worker information, health and safety, equality and labour market protections. While these regulations play an important role in safeguarding workers’ rights, businesses have raised concerns about the cumulative burden that compliance requirements can place on them, particularly when EU regulations interact with national implementation measures.

To better understand these challenges, Ecorys explored how businesses perceive compliance obligations, which requirements generate the greatest challenges, and how burdens differ across Member States and sectors. The study combined desk research, 2 online surveys, stakeholder interviews, and the development of case studies to develop a robust understanding of regulatory burden in practice.

Key Findings

The findings showed that regulatory burden arising from social legislation is the result of cumulative obligations in EU and national law, interactions between multiple instruments, and divergent national implementation practices. While the objectives of EU social policy are broadly shared, businesses experience substantial variation in how rules translate into day-to-day operational requirements. These requirements are particularly burdensome for SMEs and for businesses engaged in cross-border activities. 

Despite the challenges, the study identified a set of practices and conditions as indicated by consulted businesses that could help in reducing regulatory burden without altering the underlying objectives of EU social legislation. At the company level, businesses try to mitigate costs through digitalisation of Human Resources, payroll and reporting processes, standardisation of internal procedures and templates, and the outsourcing of specialised tasks.

Overall, the findings demonstrate that while business initiatives and upcoming EU actions aimed at simplification and burden reduction are recognised by the consulted businesses and business associations, their effects largely depend on implementation at the national level and on the extent to which they address duplication, interoperability and proportionality in practice.

https://www.businesseurope.eu/publications/smart-approaches-to-address-regulatory-burden-of-eu-social-regulations-a-businesseurope-report/